From 058f98a63658dc1a2579826ba167fd61bed1e21f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sanine Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:47:15 -0600 Subject: add assimp submodule --- .../contrib/gtest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 224 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/mesh/assimp-master/contrib/gtest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc (limited to 'src/mesh/assimp-master/contrib/gtest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc') diff --git a/src/mesh/assimp-master/contrib/gtest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc b/src/mesh/assimp-master/contrib/gtest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8f2036a --- /dev/null +++ b/src/mesh/assimp-master/contrib/gtest/samples/sample6_unittest.cc @@ -0,0 +1,224 @@ +// Copyright 2008 Google Inc. +// All Rights Reserved. +// +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +// met: +// +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +// distribution. +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +// this software without specific prior written permission. +// +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +// +// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) + +// This sample shows how to test common properties of multiple +// implementations of the same interface (aka interface tests). + +// The interface and its implementations are in this header. +#include "prime_tables.h" + +#include "gtest/gtest.h" + +// First, we define some factory functions for creating instances of +// the implementations. You may be able to skip this step if all your +// implementations can be constructed the same way. + +template +PrimeTable* CreatePrimeTable(); + +template <> +PrimeTable* CreatePrimeTable() { + return new OnTheFlyPrimeTable; +} + +template <> +PrimeTable* CreatePrimeTable() { + return new PreCalculatedPrimeTable(10000); +} + +// Then we define a test fixture class template. +template +class PrimeTableTest : public testing::Test { + protected: + // The ctor calls the factory function to create a prime table + // implemented by T. + PrimeTableTest() : table_(CreatePrimeTable()) {} + + virtual ~PrimeTableTest() { delete table_; } + + // Note that we test an implementation via the base interface + // instead of the actual implementation class. This is important + // for keeping the tests close to the real world scenario, where the + // implementation is invoked via the base interface. It avoids + // got-yas where the implementation class has a method that shadows + // a method with the same name (but slightly different argument + // types) in the base interface, for example. + PrimeTable* const table_; +}; + +#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST + +using testing::Types; + +// Google Test offers two ways for reusing tests for different types. +// The first is called "typed tests". You should use it if you +// already know *all* the types you are gonna exercise when you write +// the tests. + +// To write a typed test case, first use +// +// TYPED_TEST_CASE(TestCaseName, TypeList); +// +// to declare it and specify the type parameters. As with TEST_F, +// TestCaseName must match the test fixture name. + +// The list of types we want to test. +typedef Types Implementations; + +TYPED_TEST_CASE(PrimeTableTest, Implementations); + +// Then use TYPED_TEST(TestCaseName, TestName) to define a typed test, +// similar to TEST_F. +TYPED_TEST(PrimeTableTest, ReturnsFalseForNonPrimes) { + // Inside the test body, you can refer to the type parameter by + // TypeParam, and refer to the fixture class by TestFixture. We + // don't need them in this example. + + // Since we are in the template world, C++ requires explicitly + // writing 'this->' when referring to members of the fixture class. + // This is something you have to learn to live with. + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(-5)); + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(0)); + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(1)); + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(4)); + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(6)); + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(100)); +} + +TYPED_TEST(PrimeTableTest, ReturnsTrueForPrimes) { + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(2)); + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(3)); + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(5)); + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(7)); + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(11)); + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(131)); +} + +TYPED_TEST(PrimeTableTest, CanGetNextPrime) { + EXPECT_EQ(2, this->table_->GetNextPrime(0)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, this->table_->GetNextPrime(2)); + EXPECT_EQ(5, this->table_->GetNextPrime(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(7, this->table_->GetNextPrime(5)); + EXPECT_EQ(11, this->table_->GetNextPrime(7)); + EXPECT_EQ(131, this->table_->GetNextPrime(128)); +} + +// That's it! Google Test will repeat each TYPED_TEST for each type +// in the type list specified in TYPED_TEST_CASE. Sit back and be +// happy that you don't have to define them multiple times. + +#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST + +#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P + +using testing::Types; + +// Sometimes, however, you don't yet know all the types that you want +// to test when you write the tests. For example, if you are the +// author of an interface and expect other people to implement it, you +// might want to write a set of tests to make sure each implementation +// conforms to some basic requirements, but you don't know what +// implementations will be written in the future. +// +// How can you write the tests without committing to the type +// parameters? That's what "type-parameterized tests" can do for you. +// It is a bit more involved than typed tests, but in return you get a +// test pattern that can be reused in many contexts, which is a big +// win. Here's how you do it: + +// First, define a test fixture class template. Here we just reuse +// the PrimeTableTest fixture defined earlier: + +template +class PrimeTableTest2 : public PrimeTableTest { +}; + +// Then, declare the test case. The argument is the name of the test +// fixture, and also the name of the test case (as usual). The _P +// suffix is for "parameterized" or "pattern". +TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(PrimeTableTest2); + +// Next, use TYPED_TEST_P(TestCaseName, TestName) to define a test, +// similar to what you do with TEST_F. +TYPED_TEST_P(PrimeTableTest2, ReturnsFalseForNonPrimes) { + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(-5)); + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(0)); + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(1)); + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(4)); + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(6)); + EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(100)); +} + +TYPED_TEST_P(PrimeTableTest2, ReturnsTrueForPrimes) { + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(2)); + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(3)); + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(5)); + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(7)); + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(11)); + EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(131)); +} + +TYPED_TEST_P(PrimeTableTest2, CanGetNextPrime) { + EXPECT_EQ(2, this->table_->GetNextPrime(0)); + EXPECT_EQ(3, this->table_->GetNextPrime(2)); + EXPECT_EQ(5, this->table_->GetNextPrime(3)); + EXPECT_EQ(7, this->table_->GetNextPrime(5)); + EXPECT_EQ(11, this->table_->GetNextPrime(7)); + EXPECT_EQ(131, this->table_->GetNextPrime(128)); +} + +// Type-parameterized tests involve one extra step: you have to +// enumerate the tests you defined: +REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P( + PrimeTableTest2, // The first argument is the test case name. + // The rest of the arguments are the test names. + ReturnsFalseForNonPrimes, ReturnsTrueForPrimes, CanGetNextPrime); + +// At this point the test pattern is done. However, you don't have +// any real test yet as you haven't said which types you want to run +// the tests with. + +// To turn the abstract test pattern into real tests, you instantiate +// it with a list of types. Usually the test pattern will be defined +// in a .h file, and anyone can #include and instantiate it. You can +// even instantiate it more than once in the same program. To tell +// different instances apart, you give each of them a name, which will +// become part of the test case name and can be used in test filters. + +// The list of types we want to test. Note that it doesn't have to be +// defined at the time we write the TYPED_TEST_P()s. +typedef Types + PrimeTableImplementations; +INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(OnTheFlyAndPreCalculated, // Instance name + PrimeTableTest2, // Test case name + PrimeTableImplementations); // Type list + +#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P -- cgit v1.2.1