|
|
|
|
The objects in cairo can roughly be divided into two types: reference-counted, opaque types like cairo_surface_t and plain structures like cairo_glyph_t. cairo_path_t and cairo_path_data_t are special cases and are treated separately in this appendix.
Refcounted opaque types all have a
..._reference()
function to increase the refcount by one and a
..._destroy() to decrease the refcount
by one. These should not be exposed to the user of the language
binding, but rather used to implement memory management within
the language binding. The simplest way to do memory management
for a language binding is to treat the language binding object
as a simple handle to the cairo object. The language binding
object references the cairo object, and unreferences it when
finalized. This is the recommended method, though there are
a couple of caveats to be noted:
Equality won't work as expected. You can have two language
objects for the same cairo and they won't necessarily
compare equal. If the language allows customizing the
equality operation, then this is fixable by comparing
the underlying pointers. It also can be fixed by creating
at most one language object per cairo object, and
uniquifying via a pin table (a hash
table that goes from cairo object to language object).
For cairo_surface_t you can use also
cairo_surface_set_user_data()
instead of a separate pin table.
Derivation from the language object doesn't work because you can lose the language object while keeping the Cairo object. Code like:
public class MySurface (ImageSurface) {
public MySurface (width, height) {
super (Format.ARGB32, width, height);
}
public int get42 () {
return 42;
}
}
cr = Cairo(MySurface(width, height));
surface = cr.getTarget();
Can result in surface containing an
ImageSurface not a MySurface.
This is not easily fixable without creating memory leaks,
and it's probably best to simply forbid deriving from the
language objects.
When a plain structure is used as a return value from cairo, this is done by passing it as a “out parameter”.
cairo_font_extents_t extents; cairo_font_extents (cr, &extents);
In a language binding, this should typically be treated as a return value:
FontExtents extents = cr.fontExtents ();
A language binding has a choice in how it implements the language objects for plain structures. It can use a pure language object with fields corresponding to those of the C structure, and convert from and to the C structure when calling cairo functions or converting cairo return values. Or it can keep a pointer to the C structure internally and wrap it inside a language object much like occurs for refcounted objects. The choice should be invisible to the user: they should be able to imagine that it is implemented as a pure language object.