diff options
author | sanine <sanine.not@pm.me> | 2022-10-01 20:59:36 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | sanine <sanine.not@pm.me> | 2022-10-01 20:59:36 -0500 |
commit | c5fc66ee58f2c60f2d226868bb1cf5b91badaf53 (patch) | |
tree | 277dd280daf10bf77013236b8edfa5f88708c7e0 /libs/ode-0.16.1/OPCODE/Ice/IceRevisitedRadix.cpp | |
parent | 1cf9cc3408af7008451f9133fb95af66a9697d15 (diff) |
add ode
Diffstat (limited to 'libs/ode-0.16.1/OPCODE/Ice/IceRevisitedRadix.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | libs/ode-0.16.1/OPCODE/Ice/IceRevisitedRadix.cpp | 520 |
1 files changed, 520 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/libs/ode-0.16.1/OPCODE/Ice/IceRevisitedRadix.cpp b/libs/ode-0.16.1/OPCODE/Ice/IceRevisitedRadix.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..99a586f --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/ode-0.16.1/OPCODE/Ice/IceRevisitedRadix.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,520 @@ +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +/** + * Contains source code from the article "Radix Sort Revisited". + * \file IceRevisitedRadix.cpp + * \author Pierre Terdiman + * \date April, 4, 2000 + */ +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// + +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +/** + * Revisited Radix Sort. + * This is my new radix routine: + * - it uses indices and doesn't recopy the values anymore, hence wasting less ram + * - it creates all the histograms in one run instead of four + * - it sorts words faster than dwords and bytes faster than words + * - it correctly sorts negative floating-point values by patching the offsets + * - it automatically takes advantage of temporal coherence + * - multiple keys support is a side effect of temporal coherence + * - it may be worth recoding in asm... (mainly to use FCOMI, FCMOV, etc) [it's probably memory-bound anyway] + * + * History: + * - 08.15.98: very first version + * - 04.04.00: recoded for the radix article + * - 12.xx.00: code lifting + * - 09.18.01: faster CHECK_PASS_VALIDITY thanks to Mark D. Shattuck (who provided other tips, not included here) + * - 10.11.01: added local ram support + * - 01.20.02: bugfix! In very particular cases the last pass was skipped in the float code-path, leading to incorrect sorting...... + * - 01.02.02: - "mIndices" renamed => "mRanks". That's a rank sorter after all. + * - ranks are not "reset" anymore, but implicit on first calls + * - 07.05.02: - offsets rewritten with one less indirection. + * - 11.03.02: - "bool" replaced with RadixHint enum + * + * \class RadixSort + * \author Pierre Terdiman + * \version 1.4 + * \date August, 15, 1998 + */ +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// + +/* +To do: + - add an offset parameter between two input values (avoid some data recopy sometimes) + - unroll ? asm ? + - 11 bits trick & 3 passes as Michael did + - prefetch stuff the day I have a P3 + - make a version with 16-bits indices ? +*/ + +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +// Precompiled Header +#include "Stdafx.h" + +using namespace IceCore; + +#define INVALIDATE_RANKS mCurrentSize|=0x80000000 +#define VALIDATE_RANKS mCurrentSize&=0x7fffffff +#define CURRENT_SIZE (mCurrentSize&0x7fffffff) +#define INVALID_RANKS (mCurrentSize&0x80000000) + +#define CHECK_RESIZE(n) \ + if(n!=mPreviousSize) \ + { \ + if(n>mCurrentSize) Resize(n); \ + else ResetRanks(); \ + mPreviousSize = n; \ + } + +#define CREATE_HISTOGRAMS(type, buffer) \ + /* Clear counters/histograms */ \ + ZeroMemory(mHistogram, 256*4*sizeof(udword)); \ + \ + /* Prepare to count */ \ + ubyte* p = (ubyte*)input; \ + ubyte* pe = &p[nb*4]; \ + udword* h0= &mHistogram[0]; /* Histogram for first pass (LSB) */ \ + udword* h1= &mHistogram[256]; /* Histogram for second pass */ \ + udword* h2= &mHistogram[512]; /* Histogram for third pass */ \ + udword* h3= &mHistogram[768]; /* Histogram for last pass (MSB) */ \ + \ + bool AlreadySorted = true; /* Optimism... */ \ + \ + if(INVALID_RANKS) \ + { \ + /* Prepare for temporal coherence */ \ + type* Running = (type*)buffer; \ + type PrevVal = *Running; \ + \ + while(p!=pe) \ + { \ + /* Read input buffer in previous sorted order */ \ + type Val = *Running++; \ + /* Check whether already sorted or not */ \ + if(Val<PrevVal) { AlreadySorted = false; break; } /* Early out */ \ + /* Update for next iteration */ \ + PrevVal = Val; \ + \ + /* Create histograms */ \ + h0[*p++]++; h1[*p++]++; h2[*p++]++; h3[*p++]++; \ + } \ + \ + /* If all input values are already sorted, we just have to return and leave the */ \ + /* previous list unchanged. That way the routine may take advantage of temporal */ \ + /* coherence, for example when used to sort transparent faces. */ \ + if(AlreadySorted) \ + { \ + mNbHits++; \ + for(udword i=0;i<nb;i++) mRanks[i] = i; \ + return *this; \ + } \ + } \ + else \ + { \ + /* Prepare for temporal coherence */ \ + udword* Indices = mRanks; \ + type PrevVal = (type)buffer[*Indices]; \ + \ + while(p!=pe) \ + { \ + /* Read input buffer in previous sorted order */ \ + type Val = (type)buffer[*Indices++]; \ + /* Check whether already sorted or not */ \ + if(Val<PrevVal) { AlreadySorted = false; break; } /* Early out */ \ + /* Update for next iteration */ \ + PrevVal = Val; \ + \ + /* Create histograms */ \ + h0[*p++]++; h1[*p++]++; h2[*p++]++; h3[*p++]++; \ + } \ + \ + /* If all input values are already sorted, we just have to return and leave the */ \ + /* previous list unchanged. That way the routine may take advantage of temporal */ \ + /* coherence, for example when used to sort transparent faces. */ \ + if(AlreadySorted) { mNbHits++; return *this; } \ + } \ + \ + /* Else there has been an early out and we must finish computing the histograms */ \ + while(p!=pe) \ + { \ + /* Create histograms without the previous overhead */ \ + h0[*p++]++; h1[*p++]++; h2[*p++]++; h3[*p++]++; \ + } + +#define CHECK_PASS_VALIDITY(pass) \ + /* Shortcut to current counters */ \ + udword* CurCount = &mHistogram[pass<<8]; \ + \ + /* Reset flag. The sorting pass is supposed to be performed. (default) */ \ + bool PerformPass = true; \ + \ + /* Check pass validity */ \ + \ + /* If all values have the same byte, sorting is useless. */ \ + /* It may happen when sorting bytes or words instead of dwords. */ \ + /* This routine actually sorts words faster than dwords, and bytes */ \ + /* faster than words. Standard running time (O(4*n))is reduced to O(2*n) */ \ + /* for words and O(n) for bytes. Running time for floats depends on actual values... */ \ + \ + /* Get first byte */ \ + ubyte UniqueVal = *(((ubyte*)input)+pass); \ + \ + /* Check that byte's counter */ \ + if(CurCount[UniqueVal]==nb) PerformPass=false; + +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +/** + * Constructor. + */ +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +RadixSort::RadixSort() : mCurrentSize(0), mRanks(null), mRanks2(null), mTotalCalls(0), mNbHits(0) +{ +#ifndef RADIX_LOCAL_RAM + // Allocate input-independent ram + mHistogram = new udword[256*4]; + mOffset = new udword[256]; +#endif + // Initialize indices + INVALIDATE_RANKS; +} + +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +/** + * Destructor. + */ +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +RadixSort::~RadixSort() +{ + // Release everything +#ifndef RADIX_LOCAL_RAM + DELETEARRAY(mOffset); + DELETEARRAY(mHistogram); +#endif + DELETEARRAY(mRanks2); + DELETEARRAY(mRanks); +} + +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +/** + * Resizes the inner lists. + * \param nb [in] new size (number of dwords) + * \return true if success + */ +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +bool RadixSort::Resize(udword nb) +{ + // Free previously used ram + DELETEARRAY(mRanks2); + DELETEARRAY(mRanks); + + // Get some fresh one + mRanks = new udword[nb]; CHECKALLOC(mRanks); + mRanks2 = new udword[nb]; CHECKALLOC(mRanks2); + + return true; +} + +inline_ void RadixSort::CheckResize(udword nb) +{ + udword CurSize = CURRENT_SIZE; + if(nb!=CurSize) + { + if(nb>CurSize) Resize(nb); + mCurrentSize = nb; + INVALIDATE_RANKS; + } +} + +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +/** + * Main sort routine. + * This one is for integer values. After the call, mRanks contains a list of indices in sorted order, i.e. in the order you may process your data. + * \param input [in] a list of integer values to sort + * \param nb [in] number of values to sort, must be < 2^31 + * \param hint [in] RADIX_SIGNED to handle negative values, RADIX_UNSIGNED if you know your input buffer only contains positive values + * \return Self-Reference + */ +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +RadixSort& RadixSort::Sort(const udword* input, udword nb, RadixHint hint) +{ + // Checkings + if(!input || !nb || nb&0x80000000) return *this; + + // Stats + mTotalCalls++; + + // Resize lists if needed + CheckResize(nb); + +#ifdef RADIX_LOCAL_RAM + // Allocate histograms & offsets on the stack + udword mHistogram[256*4]; +// udword mOffset[256]; + udword* mLink[256]; +#endif + + // Create histograms (counters). Counters for all passes are created in one run. + // Pros: read input buffer once instead of four times + // Cons: mHistogram is 4Kb instead of 1Kb + // We must take care of signed/unsigned values for temporal coherence.... I just + // have 2 code paths even if just a single opcode changes. Self-modifying code, someone? + if(hint==RADIX_UNSIGNED) { CREATE_HISTOGRAMS(udword, input); } + else { CREATE_HISTOGRAMS(sdword, input); } + + // Compute #negative values involved if needed + udword NbNegativeValues = 0; + if(hint==RADIX_SIGNED) + { + // An efficient way to compute the number of negatives values we'll have to deal with is simply to sum the 128 + // last values of the last histogram. Last histogram because that's the one for the Most Significant Byte, + // responsible for the sign. 128 last values because the 128 first ones are related to positive numbers. + udword* h3= &mHistogram[768]; + for(udword i=128;i<256;i++) NbNegativeValues += h3[i]; // 768 for last histogram, 128 for negative part + } + + // Radix sort, j is the pass number (0=LSB, 3=MSB) + for(udword j=0;j<4;j++) + { + CHECK_PASS_VALIDITY(j); + + // Sometimes the fourth (negative) pass is skipped because all numbers are negative and the MSB is 0xFF (for example). This is + // not a problem, numbers are correctly sorted anyway. + if(PerformPass) + { + // Should we care about negative values? + if(j!=3 || hint==RADIX_UNSIGNED) + { + // Here we deal with positive values only + + // Create offsets +// mOffset[0] = 0; +// for(udword i=1;i<256;i++) mOffset[i] = mOffset[i-1] + CurCount[i-1]; + mLink[0] = mRanks2; + for(udword i=1;i<256;i++) mLink[i] = mLink[i-1] + CurCount[i-1]; + } + else + { + // This is a special case to correctly handle negative integers. They're sorted in the right order but at the wrong place. + + // Create biased offsets, in order for negative numbers to be sorted as well +// mOffset[0] = NbNegativeValues; // First positive number takes place after the negative ones + mLink[0] = &mRanks2[NbNegativeValues]; // First positive number takes place after the negative ones +// for(udword i=1;i<128;i++) mOffset[i] = mOffset[i-1] + CurCount[i-1]; // 1 to 128 for positive numbers + for(udword i=1;i<128;i++) mLink[i] = mLink[i-1] + CurCount[i-1]; // 1 to 128 for positive numbers + + // Fixing the wrong place for negative values +// mOffset[128] = 0; + mLink[128] = mRanks2; +// for(i=129;i<256;i++) mOffset[i] = mOffset[i-1] + CurCount[i-1]; + for(udword i=129;i<256;i++) mLink[i] = mLink[i-1] + CurCount[i-1]; + } + + // Perform Radix Sort + ubyte* InputBytes = (ubyte*)input; + InputBytes += j; + if(INVALID_RANKS) + { +// for(udword i=0;i<nb;i++) mRanks2[mOffset[InputBytes[i<<2]]++] = i; + for(udword i=0;i<nb;i++) *mLink[InputBytes[i<<2]]++ = i; + VALIDATE_RANKS; + } + else + { + udword* Indices = mRanks; + udword* IndicesEnd = &mRanks[nb]; + while(Indices!=IndicesEnd) + { + udword id = *Indices++; +// mRanks2[mOffset[InputBytes[id<<2]]++] = id; + *mLink[InputBytes[id<<2]]++ = id; + } + } + + // Swap pointers for next pass. Valid indices - the most recent ones - are in mRanks after the swap. + udword* Tmp = mRanks; mRanks = mRanks2; mRanks2 = Tmp; + } + } + return *this; +} + +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +/** + * Main sort routine. + * This one is for floating-point values. After the call, mRanks contains a list of indices in sorted order, i.e. in the order you may process your data. + * \param input [in] a list of floating-point values to sort + * \param nb [in] number of values to sort, must be < 2^31 + * \return Self-Reference + * \warning only sorts IEEE floating-point values + */ +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +RadixSort& RadixSort::Sort(const float* input2, udword nb) +{ + // Checkings + if(!input2 || !nb || nb&0x80000000) return *this; + + // Stats + mTotalCalls++; + + udword* input = (udword*)input2; + + // Resize lists if needed + CheckResize(nb); + +#ifdef RADIX_LOCAL_RAM + // Allocate histograms & offsets on the stack + udword mHistogram[256*4]; +// udword mOffset[256]; + udword* mLink[256]; +#endif + + // Create histograms (counters). Counters for all passes are created in one run. + // Pros: read input buffer once instead of four times + // Cons: mHistogram is 4Kb instead of 1Kb + // Floating-point values are always supposed to be signed values, so there's only one code path there. + // Please note the floating point comparison needed for temporal coherence! Although the resulting asm code + // is dreadful, this is surprisingly not such a performance hit - well, I suppose that's a big one on first + // generation Pentiums....We can't make comparison on integer representations because, as Chris said, it just + // wouldn't work with mixed positive/negative values.... + { CREATE_HISTOGRAMS(float, input2); } + + // Compute #negative values involved if needed + udword NbNegativeValues = 0; + // An efficient way to compute the number of negatives values we'll have to deal with is simply to sum the 128 + // last values of the last histogram. Last histogram because that's the one for the Most Significant Byte, + // responsible for the sign. 128 last values because the 128 first ones are related to positive numbers. + udword* h3= &mHistogram[768]; + for(udword i=128;i<256;i++) NbNegativeValues += h3[i]; // 768 for last histogram, 128 for negative part + + // Radix sort, j is the pass number (0=LSB, 3=MSB) + for(udword j=0;j<4;j++) + { + // Should we care about negative values? + if(j!=3) + { + // Here we deal with positive values only + CHECK_PASS_VALIDITY(j); + + if(PerformPass) + { + // Create offsets +// mOffset[0] = 0; + mLink[0] = mRanks2; +// for(udword i=1;i<256;i++) mOffset[i] = mOffset[i-1] + CurCount[i-1]; + for(udword i=1;i<256;i++) mLink[i] = mLink[i-1] + CurCount[i-1]; + + // Perform Radix Sort + ubyte* InputBytes = (ubyte*)input; + InputBytes += j; + if(INVALID_RANKS) + { +// for(i=0;i<nb;i++) mRanks2[mOffset[InputBytes[i<<2]]++] = i; + for(udword i=0;i<nb;i++) *mLink[InputBytes[i<<2]]++ = i; + VALIDATE_RANKS; + } + else + { + udword* Indices = mRanks; + udword* IndicesEnd = &mRanks[nb]; + while(Indices!=IndicesEnd) + { + udword id = *Indices++; +// mRanks2[mOffset[InputBytes[id<<2]]++] = id; + *mLink[InputBytes[id<<2]]++ = id; + } + } + + // Swap pointers for next pass. Valid indices - the most recent ones - are in mRanks after the swap. + udword* Tmp = mRanks; mRanks = mRanks2; mRanks2 = Tmp; + } + } + else + { + // This is a special case to correctly handle negative values + CHECK_PASS_VALIDITY(j); + + if(PerformPass) + { + // Create biased offsets, in order for negative numbers to be sorted as well +// mOffset[0] = NbNegativeValues; // First positive number takes place after the negative ones + mLink[0] = &mRanks2[NbNegativeValues]; // First positive number takes place after the negative ones +// for(udword i=1;i<128;i++) mOffset[i] = mOffset[i-1] + CurCount[i-1]; // 1 to 128 for positive numbers + for(udword i=1;i<128;i++) mLink[i] = mLink[i-1] + CurCount[i-1]; // 1 to 128 for positive numbers + + // We must reverse the sorting order for negative numbers! +// mOffset[255] = 0; + mLink[255] = mRanks2; +// for(i=0;i<127;i++) mOffset[254-i] = mOffset[255-i] + CurCount[255-i]; // Fixing the wrong order for negative values + for(udword i=0;i<127;i++) mLink[254-i] = mLink[255-i] + CurCount[255-i]; // Fixing the wrong order for negative values +// for(i=128;i<256;i++) mOffset[i] += CurCount[i]; // Fixing the wrong place for negative values + for(udword i=128;i<256;i++) mLink[i] += CurCount[i]; // Fixing the wrong place for negative values + + // Perform Radix Sort + if(INVALID_RANKS) + { + for(udword i=0;i<nb;i++) + { + udword Radix = input[i]>>24; // Radix byte, same as above. AND is useless here (udword). + // ### cmp to be killed. Not good. Later. +// if(Radix<128) mRanks2[mOffset[Radix]++] = i; // Number is positive, same as above +// else mRanks2[--mOffset[Radix]] = i; // Number is negative, flip the sorting order + if(Radix<128) *mLink[Radix]++ = i; // Number is positive, same as above + else *(--mLink[Radix]) = i; // Number is negative, flip the sorting order + } + VALIDATE_RANKS; + } + else + { + for(udword i=0;i<nb;i++) + { + udword Radix = input[mRanks[i]]>>24; // Radix byte, same as above. AND is useless here (udword). + // ### cmp to be killed. Not good. Later. +// if(Radix<128) mRanks2[mOffset[Radix]++] = mRanks[i]; // Number is positive, same as above +// else mRanks2[--mOffset[Radix]] = mRanks[i]; // Number is negative, flip the sorting order + if(Radix<128) *mLink[Radix]++ = mRanks[i]; // Number is positive, same as above + else *(--mLink[Radix]) = mRanks[i]; // Number is negative, flip the sorting order + } + } + // Swap pointers for next pass. Valid indices - the most recent ones - are in mRanks after the swap. + udword* Tmp = mRanks; mRanks = mRanks2; mRanks2 = Tmp; + } + else + { + // The pass is useless, yet we still have to reverse the order of current list if all values are negative. + if(UniqueVal>=128) + { + if(INVALID_RANKS) + { + // ###Possible? + for(udword i=0;i<nb;i++) mRanks2[i] = nb-i-1; + VALIDATE_RANKS; + } + else + { + for(udword i=0;i<nb;i++) mRanks2[i] = mRanks[nb-i-1]; + } + + // Swap pointers for next pass. Valid indices - the most recent ones - are in mRanks after the swap. + udword* Tmp = mRanks; mRanks = mRanks2; mRanks2 = Tmp; + } + } + } + } + return *this; +} + +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +/** + * Gets the ram used. + * \return memory used in bytes + */ +/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +udword RadixSort::GetUsedRam() const +{ + udword UsedRam = sizeof(RadixSort); +#ifndef RADIX_LOCAL_RAM + UsedRam += 256*4*sizeof(udword); // Histograms + UsedRam += 256*sizeof(udword); // Offsets +#endif + UsedRam += 2*CURRENT_SIZE*sizeof(udword); // 2 lists of indices + return UsedRam; +} |