diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'libs/assimp/contrib/gtest/test/gtest_output_test_.cc')
| -rw-r--r-- | libs/assimp/contrib/gtest/test/gtest_output_test_.cc | 1062 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1062 deletions
diff --git a/libs/assimp/contrib/gtest/test/gtest_output_test_.cc b/libs/assimp/contrib/gtest/test/gtest_output_test_.cc deleted file mode 100644 index 1070a9f..0000000 --- a/libs/assimp/contrib/gtest/test/gtest_output_test_.cc +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1062 +0,0 @@ -// Copyright 2005, Google Inc. -// All rights reserved. -// -// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without -// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are -// met: -// -// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright -// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. -// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above -// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer -// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the -// distribution. -// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its -// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from -// this software without specific prior written permission. -// -// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS -// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT -// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR -// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT -// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, -// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT -// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, -// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY -// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT -// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE -// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -// -// The purpose of this file is to generate Google Test output under -// various conditions. The output will then be verified by -// gtest_output_test.py to ensure that Google Test generates the -// desired messages. Therefore, most tests in this file are MEANT TO -// FAIL. -// -// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) - -#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" -#include "gtest/gtest.h" - -// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's -// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is -// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to -// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in -// his code. -#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 -#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" -#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ - -#include <stdlib.h> - -#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE -using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter; -using testing::TestPartResultArray; - -using testing::internal::Notification; -using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam; -#endif - -namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix; - -// Tests catching fatal failures. - -// A subroutine used by the following test. -void TestEq1(int x) { - ASSERT_EQ(1, x); -} - -// This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it -// generates, and then returns early. -void TryTestSubroutine() { - // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. - TestEq1(2); - - // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. - // - // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling - // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture. - if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return; - - // If we get here, something is wrong. - FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; -} - -TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) { -} - -TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) { -} - -// Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the -// failing test summary. -class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {}; - -TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam()); -} - -// This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print -// its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests. -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams, - FailingParamTest, - testing::Values(2)); - -static const char kGoldenString[] = "\"Line\0 1\"\nLine 2"; - -TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, EscapesStringOperands) { - std::string actual = "actual \"string\""; - EXPECT_EQ(kGoldenString, actual); - - const char* golden = kGoldenString; - EXPECT_EQ(golden, actual); -} - -TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, DiffForLongStrings) { - std::string golden_str(kGoldenString, sizeof(kGoldenString) - 1); - EXPECT_EQ(golden_str, "Line 2"); -} - -// Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine. -TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) { - printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); - - TryTestSubroutine(); -} - -// Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine. -TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) { - printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); - - // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. - TryTestSubroutine(); - - // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. - // - // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test - // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed. - if (HasFatalFailure()) return; - - // If we get here, something is wrong. - FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; -} - -// Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check. -TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) { - printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n"); - EXPECT_TRUE(false); // Generates a nonfatal failure - ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure()); // This should succeed. -} - -// Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions. -TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) { - static const int a[4] = { - 3, 9, 2, 6 - }; - - printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n"); - for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) { - printf("i == %d\n", i); - EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]); - } -} - -// Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro. - -// A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. -void SubWithoutTrace(int n) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, n); - ASSERT_EQ(2, n); -} - -// Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. -void SubWithTrace(int n) { - SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n); - - SubWithoutTrace(n); -} - -// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes. -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) { - printf("(expected to fail)\n"); - - // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked. - ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; - - { - SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace"); - // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain - // the trace. - ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace."; - } - - // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there - // should be no trace again. - ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; -} - -// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop. -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) { - printf("(expected to fail)\n"); - - for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) { - SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i); - - SubWithoutTrace(i); - } -} - -// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine. -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) { - printf("(expected to fail)\n"); - - SubWithTrace(1); - SubWithTrace(2); -} - -// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested. -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) { - printf("(expected to fail)\n"); - - SCOPED_TRACE(""); // A trace without a message. - - SubWithTrace(2); -} - -// Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope. -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) { - printf("(expected to fail)\n"); - - SCOPED_TRACE("A"); - ADD_FAILURE() - << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A."; - - SCOPED_TRACE("B"); - ADD_FAILURE() - << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B."; - - { - SCOPED_TRACE("C"); - ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should " - << "contain trace point A, B, and C."; - } - - SCOPED_TRACE("D"); - ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should " - << "contain trace point A, B, and D."; -} - -#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE -// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple -// threads. Namely, an assertion should be affected by -// SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only. - -// Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test: -// -// Thread A (main) | Thread B (spawned) -// ===============================|================================ -// spawns thread B | -// -------------------------------+-------------------------------- -// waits for n1 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); -// | generates failure #1 -// | notifies n1 -// -------------------------------+-------------------------------- -// SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | waits for n2 -// generates failure #2 | -// notifies n2 | -// -------------------------------|-------------------------------- -// waits for n3 | generates failure #3 -// | trace B dies -// | generates failure #4 -// | notifies n3 -// -------------------------------|-------------------------------- -// generates failure #5 | finishes -// trace A dies | -// generates failure #6 | -// -------------------------------|-------------------------------- -// waits for thread B to finish | - -struct CheckPoints { - Notification n1; - Notification n2; - Notification n3; -}; - -static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) { - { - SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); - ADD_FAILURE() - << "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive)."; - check_points->n1.Notify(); - check_points->n2.WaitForNotification(); - - ADD_FAILURE() - << "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive)."; - } // Trace B dies here. - ADD_FAILURE() - << "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive)."; - check_points->n3.Notify(); -} - -TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) { - printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n"); - - CheckPoints check_points; - ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace, - &check_points, - NULL); - check_points.n1.WaitForNotification(); - - { - SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); - ADD_FAILURE() - << "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive)."; - check_points.n2.Notify(); - check_points.n3.WaitForNotification(); - - ADD_FAILURE() - << "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive)."; - } // Trace A dies here. - ADD_FAILURE() - << "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive)."; - thread.Join(); -} -#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE - -TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest, - DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) { - // This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for - // verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag - // suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of - // the test output. -} - -// Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F. -// -// This function creates two failures intentionally. -void AdHocTest() { - printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n"); - EXPECT_TRUE(false); - EXPECT_EQ(2, 3); -} - -// Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test. -int RunAllTests() { - AdHocTest(); - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); -} - -// Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor. -class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { - protected: - NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { - printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n"); - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; - } - - ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor."; - } - - virtual void SetUp() { - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp()."; - } - - virtual void TearDown() { - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown."; - } -}; - -TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body."; -} - -// Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor. -class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { - protected: - FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { - printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); - Init(); - } - - ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor."; - } - - virtual void SetUp() { - ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp(). " - << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " - << "had a fatal failure."; - } - - virtual void TearDown() { - ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown(). " - << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " - << "had a fatal failure."; - } - - private: - void Init() { - FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; - } -}; - -TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { - ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body. " - << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " - << "had a fatal failure."; -} - -// Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp(). -class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { - protected: - virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() { - Deinit(); - } - - virtual void SetUp() { - printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n"); - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; - } - - virtual void TearDown() { - FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown()."; - } - private: - void Deinit() { - FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor."; - } -}; - -TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { - FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function."; -} - -// Tests fatal failures in SetUp(). -class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { - protected: - virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() { - Deinit(); - } - - virtual void SetUp() { - printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n"); - FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; - } - - virtual void TearDown() { - FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown()."; - } - private: - void Deinit() { - FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor."; - } -}; - -TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { - FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function. " - << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed."; -} - -TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) { - ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc"; -} - -#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE - -// A unary function that may die. -void DieIf(bool should_die) { - GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf()."; -} - -// Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context. - -// Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread. -struct SpawnThreadNotifications { - SpawnThreadNotifications() {} - - Notification spawn_thread_started; - Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate; - - private: - GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications); -}; - -// The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the -// MultipleThreads test (below). -static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) { - // Signals the main thread that this thread has started. - notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify(); - - // Waits for permission to finish from the main thread. - notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification(); -} - -// This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest -// suffix. It starts threads which might interfere with later -// death tests, so it must run after all other death tests. -class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test { - protected: - // Starts a thread and waits for it to begin. - virtual void SetUp() { - thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>( - &ThreadRoutine, ¬ifications_, NULL)); - notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification(); - } - // Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it. - // Depending on the version of the thread library in use, - // a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere - // with later death tests. This is unfortunate, but this class - // cleans up after itself as best it can. - virtual void TearDown() { - notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify(); - } - - private: - SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_; - testing::internal::scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > - thread_; -}; - -#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE - -// The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a -// test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in -// the same test case use. It deliberately contains two fixture -// classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces. - -// The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that -// when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND -// same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will -// fail. - -namespace foo { - -class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { -}; - -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} - -class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { -}; - -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, - TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} - -} // namespace foo - -namespace bar { - -class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { -}; - -// The following two tests are expected to fail. We rely on the -// golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message. -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {} -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {} - -class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { -}; - -// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test -// generates the right error message. -TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, - TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} - -} // namespace bar - -// The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user -// error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case. The first -// test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and -// the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F. - -class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { -}; - -TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {} - -// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test -// generates the right error message. -TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {} - -class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { -}; - -TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {} - -// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test -// generates the right error message. -TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) { -} - -// Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(). -int global_integer = 0; - -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { - global_integer = 0; - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ - EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; - }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables -// (static or not). -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) { - int m = 0; - static int n; - n = 1; - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ - EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; - }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly -// one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure. -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; - }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no -// non-fatal failure. -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) { - printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ - }, ""); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two -// non-fatal failures. -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) { - printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1."; - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2."; - }, ""); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal -// failure. -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { - printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ - FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; - }, ""); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being -// tested returns. -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { - printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ - return; - }, ""); -} - -#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS - -// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being -// tested throws. -TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { - printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); - try { - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ - throw 0; - }, ""); - } catch(int) { // NOLINT - } -} - -#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS - -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { - global_integer = 0; - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ - ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure."; - }, "Expected fatal failure."); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static -// variables. -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) { - static int n; - n = 1; - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ - ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure."; - }, "Expected fatal failure."); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly -// one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure. -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ - FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; - }, "Expected fatal failure."); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal -// failure. -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) { - printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ - }, ""); -} - -// A helper for generating a fatal failure. -void FatalFailure() { - FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two -// fatal failures. -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) { - printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ - FatalFailure(); - FatalFailure(); - }, ""); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal -// failure. -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { - printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; - }, ""); -} - -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being -// tested returns. -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { - printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ - return; - }, ""); -} - -#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS - -// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being -// tested throws. -TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { - printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); - try { - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ - throw 0; - }, ""); - } catch(int) { // NOLINT - } -} - -#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS - -// This #ifdef block tests the output of value-parameterized tests. - -#if GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - -std::string ParamNameFunc(const testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& info) { - return info.param; -} - -class ParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<std::string> { -}; - -TEST_P(ParamTest, Success) { - EXPECT_EQ("a", GetParam()); -} - -TEST_P(ParamTest, Failure) { - EXPECT_EQ("b", GetParam()) << "Expected failure"; -} - -INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingStrings, - ParamTest, - testing::Values(std::string("a")), - ParamNameFunc); - -#endif // GTEST_HAS_PARAM_TEST - -// This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests. -#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST - -template <typename T> -class TypedTest : public testing::Test { -}; - -TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>); - -TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) { - EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam()); -} - -TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) { - EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; -} - -#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST - -// This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests. -#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P - -template <typename T> -class TypedTestP : public testing::Test { -}; - -TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP); - -TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) { - EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam()); -} - -TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) { - EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; -} - -REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure); - -typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes; -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes); - -#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P - -#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST - -// We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case -// name ends with DeathTest are run first. - -TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { -} - -# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST - -// We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test -// case name ends with DeathTest are run first. - -template <typename T> -class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test { -}; - -typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes; -TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes); - -TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { -} - -# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST - -# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P - - -// We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests -// whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first. - -template <typename T> -class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test { -}; - -TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest); - -TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { -} - -REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst); - -INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes); - -# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P - -#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST - -// Tests various failure conditions of -// EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}. -class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test { - public: // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2. - enum FailureMode { - FATAL_FAILURE, - NONFATAL_FAILURE - }; - static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) { - if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) { - FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; - } else { - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; - } - } -}; - -TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { - // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); - // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal " - "failure."); - // Wrong message. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure " - "expected."); -} - -TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { - // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure."); - // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure."); - // Wrong message. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal " - "failure."); -} - -#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE - -class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest { - protected: - static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) { - ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL); - thread.Join(); - } -}; - -TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { - // We only intercept the current thread. - printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE), - "Expected fatal failure."); -} - -TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { - // We only intercept the current thread. - printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE), - "Expected non-fatal failure."); -} - -typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest; - -// Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from -// the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD. -TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) { - printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); - TestPartResultArray results; - { - ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter( - ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD, - &results); - AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE); - AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE); - } - // The two failures should not have been intercepted. - EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail."; -} - -#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE - -TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { - // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); - // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), - "Expected non-fatal failure."); - // Wrong message. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), - "Some other fatal failure expected."); -} - -TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { - // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal " - "failure."); - // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), - "Expected fatal failure."); - // Wrong message. - printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); - EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), - "Some other non-fatal failure."); -} - - -// Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(). - -class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment { - public: - virtual void SetUp() { - printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); - } - - virtual void TearDown() { - printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); - FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; - } -}; - -class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment { - public: - virtual void SetUp() { - printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); - } - - virtual void TearDown() { - printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); - ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; - } -}; - -// The main function. -// -// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some -// of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results -// with the "golden" file. -int main(int argc, char **argv) { - testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false; - - // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail. - // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of - // this program with the golden file. - - // It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many - // global side effects. The following line serves as a sanity test - // for it. - testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); - bool internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests = - std::count(argv, argv + argc, - std::string("internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests")) > 0; - -#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST - if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") { - // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child - // process of an threadsafe-style death test. -# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS - posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout); -# else - posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout); -# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); - } -#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST - - if (internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) - return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); - - // Registers two global test environments. - // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they - // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order. - testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); - testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment); - - return RunAllTests(); -} |